You are a woman because you say the words, “I’m a woman”.

I’ve been closely watching UK politics specifically for the intimidation and posturing that the British Trans Rights Activists have been doing. The Brit TRAs are no different than the Transactivists & their allies in the US, Canada, and elsewhere in Anglophone western countries. As well, Francophone TRAs behave the same as their English speaking peers.

 

What’s publicly unfolded in the UK is special. This country is the only jurisdiction where the government has done a “public consultation” and not a “parliament-only” consultation to reform a current law. That public consultation has asked for every Brit’s opinion about what the impact would be IF the Tory government had changed the current law of the Gender Recognition Act regarding who could identify as a woman and as a man, or as non-binary.

 

The change to the GRA would impact in this way:

 

1) The process of how a Brit could claim to be the gender of a woman or a man.

 

And it would impact in this way:

 

2) Establish self-ID and whittle down the current gatekeeping and safeguarding to permit a self-declaration of being a woman or a man as the only necessary administrative process. This would mean, speak the words, “I’m A Woman” and that statement would make you a legally recognized woman.

 

So then, I’ve been watching the fallout in the UK.

 

Absolute gender self-ID — which is only a self-reported declaration — has already harmed girls, boys and women in the United Kingdom.

 

Self-ID done with impunity has meant this:

 

Predatory men exploiting self-ID.

 

Such men have been:

The Trans Rights Activists have yet, and probably never will, denounce each male pedophile and rapist who have used self-ID. Such men have abused self-ID to transfer themselves into a women’s prison. They have also continued to do their sexual crimes while dressed as women.

 

Finally:

 

I’ve uploaded to my website the BBC Newsnight episode, “Changing Gender: Should the law change?”.

 

In sum, the fallout in the UK has meant this:

 

When women have tried to gather in public spaces, Trans Rights Activists have undoubtedly done intimidation tactics. These tactics are also famously done by organized crime and gangs. As well, tribal societies do the tactics of posturing and intimidation, and they do it as tribal war.

 

So then, here’s what the British TRAs have consistently done to women who have spoken against their political mantra for gender self-ID. That mantra is for all men to say they’re women, which includes male pedophiles and rapists:

 

1. Trans Rights Activists have mobbed & assaulted women (Example: Maria MacLachlan).

 

2. They have slurred women (Example: Transgender apologists, Owen Jones & Adrian Harrop).

 

3. They have unjustly — because it’s against democracy — banned women from holding their meetings in civic buildings (Example: Leeds Civic Hall).

 

4. They have no-platformed women (Example: Germaine Greer, Julie Bindel).

 

5. They have banned women from Twitter (Example: Venice Allan & transsexual Miranda Yardley)

 

6. And they have intimidated women to hide & their cancel meetings.

 

This demonstrates that the TRAs consistently behave as gangs. They do unrelenting aggression toward women, and specifically have done that to Woman’s Place.

Men like Karen White, of course, exploit Gender self-ID

Stephen Wood enjoys pretending he’s a woman called Karen White. Gender self-ID is a facade to Stephen Wood. Self-ID was the easiest method for him to exploit. It earned him an easy transfer into the women’s prison HMP New Hall, in Flockton, the UK.

The prosecution was absolutely right about Karen White.

Christopher Dunn, the prosecutor, told the Leeds Crown Court:

She is allegedly a transgender female. The prosecution say allegedly because there’s smatterings of evidence in this case that the defendant’s approach to transitioning has been less than committed.”

“The prosecution suggest the reason for the lack of commitment towards transitioning is so the defendant can use a transgender persona to put herself in contact with vulnerable persons she can then abuse.

Gender self-ID is wonderfully open to abuse by:

It’s completely open to exploitation by a…

and a…

It’s a sad story that Stephen Wood could have been kept out of the women’s prison with safeguarding. However, safeguarding is completely non-existent when self-ID is the rule.

So then, Stephen Wood had sexually assaulted the women inmates within days of arriving at HMP New Hall in Flockton, near Wakefield, during the autumn of 2017. As Karen White, he watched and ogled the natal women in the communal showers:

However, Karen White could be transferred back into a women’s prison.

Richard Garside, the Director of @crimeandjustice, has an explanation as to why Stephen Wood as Karen White could be housed again in a women’s prison:

Could Karen White be transferred back to a women’s prison? The short answer is yes. Here’s how…”

Gender self-ID: A path of least resistance for men like Karen White

Trans Women are Women, and these Women will never abuse self-ID.

 

So goes the motto, and also this…

 

Predatory men will never abuse self-ID.

 

These are statements of creed by Trans Rights Activists. The TRAs will simply not admit, for one minute, that there are predatory males who will exploit self-ID. Such men are:

Otherwise known as:

There will always be a Stephen Wood who will self-identify as a woman to continue to do his sexual crimes with this self-ID as his cover and ruse.

Self-ID is fundamentally open to exploitation by male pedophiles, rapists and by any man who does male pattern sexual crime.

Self-ID has no requisite gatekeeping and safeguarding as part of its philosophy. So then, say the words “I’m A Woman” and wear the facade of a wig, blouse and prosthetic breasts, and you could go into any space that’s only for women. You could self-ID while you’re incarcerated in a men’s prison and enjoy a transfer into a women’s prison where the most vulnerable women are housed. Self-ID is a means to an end for all the predatory males who will do any tactic to do their sexual crimes.

Never underestimate men like:

The Karen Whites are calculating and emotionally manipulative males. They will game and chance any philosophy and system to do their sexual crimes. Example: Karen White had repeatedly abused his neighbours in social housing in the village of Mytholmroyd, West Yorkshire before he was sent to a men’s prison and then to a women’s prison. He abused their belief in human rights by threatening to report them to the police for a hate crime. He threatened every time they never called him a “her” and each time they critically questioned the veracity of his self-ID.

Here’s what the neighbours said:

We did not have a problem with her being transgender. We already had another transgender woman living here and we all got on just fine. [But Karen White] was always calling the police accusing us of hate crimes against her. And then she started getting violent – it was a terrifying time for all of us – we wish she had never been placed here.”

As well, there are too many “woke” useful idiots like Adrian Harrop and Owen Jones who drivel it’s bigotry and phobia to say that predatory males will exploit self-ID. They stupidly drivel that this demonizes transgender people and it implies they’re sexual predators. The useful idiots repeat the mantra that it conflates transgender women with sexual predators whenever we speak that male pedophiles and rapists will exploit self-ID. They chant that it adds to the stigma some transgender women experience.

However the Self-ID Apologists will eventually perceive that patience for their rhetoric has run out.

To the Gender Apologists, I say this: “Yes, please, continue to remain mute and complicit about self-ID being exploitable.”

Eventually the pawns for the bullish and militant Transactivists will succumb to ridicule because they chose to never admit that there are men like Karen White.

The Transgender Activists’ Rule of 3: No-platform, TERF isn’t a slur, and dissent is met with violence

I had to lock my Twitter to private.

It’s this specific Twitter convo that’s the reason why I made my Twitter private:

 

 

 
Katelyn Burns took notice of my convo on Graham Linehan’s Twitter timeline. She was miffed by my tweet that mentioned her name, and she made it clear that I must retract this tweet:
 

 

However, let me ask this: Has Katelyn ever discussed that she’s categorically against no-platforming?

 

Apparently, Katelyn is partial to no-platforming TERFs because of this question she asked on Twitter:

 

Should we NOT no-platform TERFs then? Because that would be “lecturing women on what to do”. Where’s the line?
 

 

So then, Katelyn Burns is NOT categorically against no-platforming.

 

She certainly wouldn’t speak up when the Trans Rights squad demand:

 

 
As well, the above snippet is from Katelyn’s discussion on Twitter about Contrapoints doing a public speaking event with Blaire White and Theryn Meyer in Vancouver, British Columbia, on January 12th in 2018. As usual, Transactivists and their allies had a tantrum, and this time it was about Contrapoints having the audacity to publicly appear with Blaire White. Trans Twits have righteous tantrums whenever one of their own is a seeming traitor to their political tribe. Blaire White is a major sore spot to the Transactivists.
However, the full Twitter discussion showed that Katelyn Burns was sympathetic to Contrapoints.
 

And yet, Katelyn is fine using the word TERF.

 

Katelyn causally says TERF very often in her vocabulary. To her the word TERF is only a neutral descriptor. Katelyn, as well, hasn’t been on the receiving end of this word that’s fully intended to intimidate, shame and discredit both the women & men it’s directed at.

 

In all, Katelyn wouldn’t ever perceive TERF as a slur because it’s never been used to denigrate, shame, and discredit her.

 

2 strikes out of 3 for Katelyn Burns because it’s only VIOLENCE that she hasn’t publicly called out for against TERFs.

 

So, yes, Katelyn has never publicly made a call to arms for violence to be done to TERFs. However, anyone could be slurred as a TERF.

 

 

That belittling word, TERF, is launched by Transactivists against anyone who publicly engages them with disagreement and dissent to their foundational beliefs about gender. One such belief is unconditional self-ID.

 

Whenever you challenge Trans Rights Activists to deeply scrutinize self-ID, they will crack open their play book and immediately slur you as “Phobic“, “Hateful“, a “Bigot” and as a TERF.

 

They do not care to engage the real problem of male pedophiles and rapists who have been exploiting self-ID to use it as a cover to continue doing their sexual crimes. These predatory men are calculating and will exploit any method, like self-ID, to skip suspicion and safeguarding. Finally self-ID completely dismantles safeguarding.

 
But, oh well.
 
In all, I had to lock my Twitter account to private because the Transgender TWITTER STASI had started to pepper my Twitter account with the motto of “TERF Is Not A Slur“.
 
Within seconds, and I do mean ‘seconds‘, Trans Women with blue checkmarks read Katelyn’s tweet to my account and they began to pepper my Twitter account with “TERF Is Not A Slur“.
 

As well the Twitter accounts without the blue checkmark, which rally as uncritical pawns for the TRAs, had begun to tweet my Twitter account to shame it:

 
 

 

And yet, I won’t retract my tweet.
 

Katelyn Burns would only not say in public that violence against TERFs is condonable.

 

Finally, Transgender Ideology — or call it Transgenderism — is currently dominated by White Trans Women who behave as doctrinaires and they do tactics of intimidation. Their enforcement of gender dogma and their intimidation is my point. Their intimidation is no better than what organized crime does.

“It’s our room” and that means you can’t use it!

I’ve been watching politics in the United Kingdom specifically to see how women’s groups have been treated by government and businesses. The bad news is that many government officials, like municipal councillors, have consumed the Transgender religion. And, yes, Transgender ideology is a religion, creed and faith. The beliefs are metaphysical, and words alone are valued more than material reality. Example: Only a statement from human language is needed to transmorgrify a human male into a girl or woman. A woman is an adult human female, and a boy or man only need to say the words “I’m A Woman” and those words would transform his body into a female body. The belief of self-ID is entirely a metaphysical belief, and all religions have relied on self-ID to convert and impassion people to join and maintain them. Religions have also scared people to capitulate to them.

Words alone have been valued more than physical reality by many religions, which precede today’s Transgender political rhetoric. Christianity heavily relied on words, such as logos and transubstantiation.

So this is the bad news: Elected officials in all levels of the United Kingdom government have either converted to being convinced believers in the Transgender rhetoric of self-ID, or they’re cowards and are too scared to confront the Trans Rights Activists.

Civil servants in the United Kingdom do whatever the militant Trans Rights Activists command them to do. However, the good news is that more people are getting fed up with those councillors being partisans who are subservient to the TRAs. People are also disgusted with them because they are deliberately breaking the laws they have to agreed to. Such laws include due process. As well, they’re corrupt because of having “a conflict of interest“. That “conflict of interest” is their favouritism and partiality to the TRAs.

One such municipal councillor who had deliberately broke the law by doing a “conflict of interest” was Jessica Lennox. In Leeds, she’s the Labour councillor for the ward of Crossgates & Whinmoor.

Here’s the full Twitter screed from Jessica Lennox:

As well, Richard Firth told Adrian Harrop that he had tipped off Jess.

Richard is the Leeds Green Party officer for “Equality, Diversity and Inclusion“.

Richard stated very clearly to Harrop that the venue where Woman’s Place had booked for their meeting on September 28th was Leeds Civic Hall. Jessica Lennox was also a member of the group who planned to counter-protest Woman’s Place. Right there is Jessica’s “conflict of interest“.

Richard Firth also did his own Twitter screed to educate us that he was on the right side of history:

He no-platformed Woman’s Place from Leeds Civic Hall. His side certainly enjoys making up blasphemy laws to censor with. Richard will also do the ban again if he got another chance:

However, despite two sanctimonious converts, Woman’s Place did succeed in holding their meeting at a pub in Leeds. As well, Victoria Hotel better buckle up for the missionary Trans Rights Activists to mob and shame it for hosting Woman’s Place. Such zealots like to dominant a business to no-platform anyone who are heathens, which are bigots, to them.

Finally, Jessica Lennox closed her Twitter account on September 29th. She, however, knows she’s on the right side of history and her Twitter account was only a martyr. Praise be to Gender.

UK Girl Guides: No to safeguarding, Yes to Transgender.

In the United Kingdom, two Guide leaders (Helen Watts and another) have been expelled. What was the reason for their dishonourable discharge? Helen and the other leader had publicly discussed their concerns about safeguarding in the Girl Guides. Their concerns were about the organisation’s transgender policy. Since then, both of their units have been closed down by the Girl Guides.

Helen Watts, who was one of 12 leaders that signed a letter to The Sunday Times asking for a review of the Guides’ transgender policy, was told she was fired. This expulsion was done regardless of Helen’s membership for more than 15 years.

What’s the policy that the UK Girl Guides have for boys & men who gender themselves as female?

1) Boys & men can self-ID their gender as girls and women. This means they can say they’re girls and women and do nothing further to make their new identity accepted. It’s only the statement of words that are required.

2) Those boys & men will never have their identification of gender disclosed to the parents of the natal girls who are members of the same unit.

3) Safeguarding is only reliant on a criminal conviction. This means that a Guide Leader (with no prior criminal record), who IDs as a Transgender Woman, could groom and sexually assault the natal girls in her unit.

A Guide Leader could very well sexually assault while also not being red flagged because this adult was already vetted and made a unit leader because of having no prior criminal record. This concern is legitimate because many Transgender Women currently are heterosexual and also choose to keep their male genitals. Such Trans Women keep their penis intact while also calling it “feminine” and “girl dick“.

4) Men are the majority of the adults who perpetrate rape and sexual assault.

Rape is specifically done by males, and is defined in law as unwanted penetration done by the penis. In other words, both men and teen boys do male pattern sexual violence. Both natal males and trans women commit rape because both have a penis.

Example: The women’s prisons in the UK are totally compromised right now because of male rapists and pedophiles being housed in them due to being permitted to ID as women. And, yes, it’s a problem that male rapists and pedophiles like Karen White are exploiting self-ID.

5) Safeguarding is completely dismantled right now because of the Girl Guides allowing adult males who self-ID as women to be Guide Leaders. Men comprise the majority of people who recruit and groom to sexually exploit, molest and rape. So it’s now a question of when and not if a natal girl in a Girl Guide unit will be groomed, molested, sexually assaulted and raped by a grown man who IDs as a woman.

Finally, Girl Guides will ban any girl from being a Guide who IDs herself as a boy or as gender-nonconforming. That’s right: This is a double standard. These are two different, and unfair rules, where one is for natal girls who ID as male and the other is for natal boys who ID as female.

Boys and men absolutely win by this hypocritical, double standard that’s been orchestrated by Girl Guides because either can ID as female and be a leader or a Guide. Meanwhile girls and women lose because if they ID as male or as gender-nonconforming, they’re banned.

Girl Guides as an organization for girls, which are the child human females, have lost the plot.

Philip Bunce cosplays as a Woman and is given an award.

Philip Bunce

Congratulations goes to Philip Bunce because he was given an award that was meant for females. The award he received was for the “Top 100 Female Executives“. That’s right. I will iterate again: A natal male was celebrated with an award meant only for females.

Holy shit.

Also Philip Bunce was given this award not once, but twice. He got it first in 2017 and now in 2018.

Why did this man get a business award meant only for Female Executives? Oh we can’t really know unless we scrutinize the reason.

Pippa Bunce

This reason would be that Phil cosplays as a woman occasionally. He picks a day to cross-dress in a blonde wig and a woman’s dress, and then shows up to his job dressed like that.

Phil arbitrarily picks a day, and then shows up to work calling himself “Pippa“. Of course, Phil dresses in a wig and clothes that are only his idea of what a woman must wear. Phil is only wearing his idea of what a woman should look like while adorned with cosmetics and clothes. This idea is called a stereotype. You can also call it a caricature.

Pips Bunce

So we must celebrate this progress. However, this is truly a farce.

Congratulations Pips for enjoying this award two times:

2017 Top 50 Women

1537672111549

100 Female Executives 2018

1537672136707

As well, please read the understandable anger posted on Facebook from the natal females to this award being given to a man.

1537672816879