You are a woman because you say the words, “I’m a woman”.

I’ve been closely watching UK politics specifically for the intimidation and posturing that the British Trans Rights Activists have been doing. The Brit TRAs are no different than the Transactivists & their allies in the US, Canada, and elsewhere in Anglophone western countries. As well, Francophone TRAs behave the same as their English speaking peers.

 

What’s publicly unfolded in the UK is special. This country is the only jurisdiction where the government has done a “public consultation” and not a “parliament-only” consultation to reform a current law. That public consultation has asked for every Brit’s opinion about what the impact would be IF the Tory government had changed the current law of the Gender Recognition Act regarding who could identify as a woman and as a man, or as non-binary.

 

The change to the GRA would impact in this way:

 

1) The process of how a Brit could claim to be the gender of a woman or a man.

 

And it would impact in this way:

 

2) Establish self-ID and whittle down the current gatekeeping and safeguarding to permit a self-declaration of being a woman or a man as the only necessary administrative process. This would mean, speak the words, “I’m A Woman” and that statement would make you a legally recognized woman.

 

So then, I’ve been watching the fallout in the UK.

 

Absolute gender self-ID — which is only a self-reported declaration — has already harmed girls, boys and women in the United Kingdom.

 

Self-ID done with impunity has meant this:

 

Predatory men exploiting self-ID.

 

Such men have been:

The Trans Rights Activists have yet to, and probably never will, denounce each male pedophile and rapist who have used self-ID. Such men have abused self-ID to transfer themselves into a women’s prison. They have also continued to do their sexual crimes while dressed as women.

 

Finally:

 

I’ve uploaded to my website the BBC Newsnight episode, “Changing Gender: Should the law change?”.

 

In sum, the fallout in the UK has meant this:

 

When women have tried to gather in public spaces, Trans Rights Activists have undoubtedly done intimidation tactics. These tactics are also famously done by organized crime and gangs. As well, tribal societies do the tactics of posturing and intimidation, and they do it as tribal war.

 

So then, here’s what the British TRAs have consistently done to women who have spoken against their political mantra for gender self-ID. That mantra is for all men to say they’re women, which includes male pedophiles and rapists:

 

1. Trans Rights Activists have mobbed & assaulted women (Example: Maria MacLachlan).

 

2. They have slurred women (Example: Transgender apologists, Owen Jones & Adrian Harrop).

 

3. They have unjustly — because it’s against democracy — banned women from holding their meetings in civic buildings (Example: Leeds Civic Hall).

 

4. They have no-platformed women (Example: Germaine Greer, Julie Bindel).

 

5. They have banned women from Twitter (Example: Venice Allan & transsexual Miranda Yardley)

 

6. And they have intimidated women to hide & their cancel meetings.

 

This demonstrates that the TRAs consistently behave as gangs. They do unrelenting aggression toward women, and specifically have done that to Woman’s Place.

The Transgender Activists’ Rule of 3: No-platform, TERF isn’t a slur, and dissent is met with violence

I had to lock my Twitter to private.

It’s this specific Twitter convo that’s the reason why I made my Twitter private:

 

 

 
Katelyn Burns took notice of my convo on Graham Linehan’s Twitter timeline. She was miffed by my tweet that mentioned her name, and she made it clear that I must retract this tweet:
 

 

However, let me ask this: Has Katelyn ever discussed that she’s categorically against no-platforming?

 

Apparently, Katelyn is partial to no-platforming TERFs because of this question she asked on Twitter:

 

Should we NOT no-platform TERFs then? Because that would be “lecturing women on what to do”. Where’s the line?
 

 

So then, Katelyn Burns is NOT categorically against no-platforming.

 

She certainly wouldn’t speak up when the Trans Rights squad demand:

 

 
As well, the above snippet is from Katelyn’s discussion on Twitter about Contrapoints doing a public speaking event with Blaire White and Theryn Meyer in Vancouver, British Columbia, on January 12th in 2018. As usual, Transactivists and their allies had a tantrum, and this time it was about Contrapoints having the audacity to publicly appear with Blaire White. Trans Twits have righteous tantrums whenever one of their own is a seeming traitor to their political tribe. Blaire White is a major sore spot to the Transactivists.
However, the full Twitter discussion showed that Katelyn Burns was sympathetic to Contrapoints.
 

And yet, Katelyn is fine using the word TERF.

 

Katelyn causally says TERF very often in her vocabulary. To her the word TERF is only a neutral descriptor. Katelyn, as well, hasn’t been on the receiving end of this word that’s fully intended to intimidate, shame and discredit both the women & men it’s directed at.

 

In all, Katelyn wouldn’t ever perceive TERF as a slur because it’s never been used to denigrate, shame, and discredit her.

 

2 strikes out of 3 for Katelyn Burns because it’s only VIOLENCE that she hasn’t publicly called out for against TERFs.

 

So, yes, Katelyn has never publicly made a call to arms for violence to be done to TERFs. However, anyone could be slurred as a TERF.

 

 

That belittling word, TERF, is launched by Transactivists against anyone who publicly engages them with disagreement and dissent to their foundational beliefs about gender. One such belief is unconditional self-ID.

 

Whenever you challenge Trans Rights Activists to deeply scrutinize self-ID, they will crack open their play book and immediately slur you as “Phobic“, “Hateful“, a “Bigot” and as a TERF.

 

They do not care to engage the real problem of male pedophiles and rapists who have been exploiting self-ID to use it as a cover to continue doing their sexual crimes. These predatory men are calculating and will exploit any method, like self-ID, to skip suspicion and safeguarding. Finally self-ID completely dismantles safeguarding.

 
But, oh well.
 
In all, I had to lock my Twitter account to private because the Transgender TWITTER STASI had started to pepper my Twitter account with the motto of “TERF Is Not A Slur“.
 
Within seconds, and I do mean ‘seconds‘, Trans Women with blue checkmarks read Katelyn’s tweet to my account and they began to pepper my Twitter account with “TERF Is Not A Slur“.
 

As well the Twitter accounts without the blue checkmark, which rally as uncritical pawns for the TRAs, had begun to tweet my Twitter account to shame it:

 
 

 

And yet, I won’t retract my tweet.
 

Katelyn Burns would only not say in public that violence against TERFs is condonable.

 

Finally, Transgender Ideology — or call it Transgenderism — is currently dominated by White Trans Women who behave as doctrinaires and they do tactics of intimidation. Their enforcement of gender dogma and their intimidation is my point. Their intimidation is no better than what organized crime does.