People are Fish

 

The Transactivists are too late. The lobster emoji is already adopted by Jordan Peterson’s fans as their symbol of solidarity with Jordan Peterson.

 

Jordan Peterson, Cathy Newman interview on Channel 4:

There’s this idea that hierarchical structures are a sociological construct of the Western patriarchy and that is so untrue that it’s almost unbelievable, and I use the lobster as an example because we divulged from lobsters in evolutionary history about three hundred fifty million years ago. Lobsters exist in hierarchies and have a nervous system attuned to the hierarchy, and that nervous system runs on serotonin just like our nervous systems do. The nervous system of the lobster and of the human being is so similar that antidepressants work on lobsters.”

Specifically the men who gender as women often refer to animals like the Clown Fish to prove their beliefs that humans can also morph every cell of their body to transform their biological sex.

Clown fish males can naturally change their genitals into female genitals. So when a dominant female clown fish dies, a male clown fish will morph its body into a female body. The Clown Fish does this as a natural ability. It’s a capacity that the species can do, and it’s biologically done without Human inventions such synthetic manufactured hormones and cosmetic surgeries like gender affirmation surgery.

Clownfish, wrasses, moray eels, gobies and other fish species are known to change sex. A school of clownfish is always a hierarchy with a dominant female. When she dies, the most dominant male changes sex and takes her place.

Sex Change in Clownfish: Molecular Insights from Transcriptome Analysis

Teleost fishes (like the Clown fish) display the largest array of sex-determining systems among animals, resulting in a large number of reproductive strategies, a key factor in explaining their success during evolution. Among these, functional hermaphroditism is a unique strategy that has been adopted by at least 27 families across seven orders of teleosts, mainly in the coral reef environment.1

 

In simultaneous hermaphroditism individuals possess fully functional male and female gonads while in sequential hermaphroditism fish change sex sometime during its life, either from male to female (protandry) or from female to male (protogyny). Factors triggering sex change differ among species. In some, particularly in protandrous species, sex change is size dependent and eventually every fish in the population will change sex. In territorial-haremic species sex change is socially mediated, and it is more common in protogynous species. One interesting exception are the clownfishes (subfamily Amphiprioninae) which are protandrous, monogamous and sex change seems to be controlled socially, i.e. male does not change sex when attaining a certain size, but only after the female disappearance.2 3

Clownfishes live in social assemblages as pairs or social groups consisting of a dominant female, always the largest in size, surrounded by a male and a variable number of immature juveniles of smaller size.4

Clownfish species display a strong social hierarchy based on size.5

These hierarchies function as queues for breeding. In a given group, the fish age and grow larger together, with their relative size differences and the dominance hierarchies among group members remaining unchanged.6

 

Although a simplification, we hereafter call these social assemblages families. If the dominant female of a family dies, all subordinates seize the opportunity to ascend in rank and grow. The male is poised to become female and rapidly changes sex to assume the vacated position, while the largest undifferentiated fish completes the breeding pair by turning into a mature male in a short time.7 8

This ability allows the formation of a new breeding pair, preventing the need for dangerous travel across the reef, but requires the presence of subdominant fish to complete the sex change.9

Footnotes:

1. Sadovy de Micheson Y. & Liu M.Functional hermaphroditism in teleosts. Fish Fish. 9, 1–43 (2008)

 

2. Moyer J. T. & Nakazono A. Protandeous Hermaphroditism in Six Species of the Anemonefish Genus Amphiprion in Japan. Japanese J. Ichthyol. 25, 101–106 (1978)

 

3. Fricke H. H. W. Social Control of Sex: Field Experiments with the Anemonefish Amphiprion bicinctus. Z. Tierpsychol. 61, 71–77 (1983)

 

4. Fricke H. W. & Fricke S. Monogamy and sex change by aggressive dominance in coral reef fish. Nature 266, 830–832 (1977)

 

5. Ochi H. Mating behavior and sex change of the anemonefish, Amphiprion clarkii, in the temperate waters of southern Japan. Environ. Biol. Fishes 26, 257–275 (1989)

 

6. Buston P. Social hierarchies: Size and growth modification in clownfish. Nature 424, 145–146 (2003)

 

7. Moyer J. T. & Nakazono A. Protandeous Hermaphroditism in Six Species of the Anemonefish Genus Amphiprion in Japan. Japhanese J. Ichthyol. 25, 101–106 (1978)

 

8. Fricke H. W. & Fricke S. Monogamy and sex change by aggressive dominance in coral reef fish. Nature 266, 830–832 (1977)

 

9. Fricke H. H. W. Social Control of Sex: Field Experiments with the Anemonefish Amphiprion bicinctus. Z. Tierpsychol. 61, 71–77 (1983)

 

Fish are, of course, the closest animal relatives that Humans have. People are in no way closely related to apes like Chimpanzees. Apes can’t naturally morph their genitals and every cell of their bodies, which is why Transgender Activists want Humans to be the same as Clown Fish. Clown Fish suit their arguments for their ideology.

 

Clown Fish, of course, don’t have the Human ideas of Gender and Transgender, and I suspect that Clown Fish also only care about what Clown Fish can and can’t do with their bodies. Clown Fish don’t care about Humans because Humans are land dwelling apes.

 

However, “People are fish”. Transgender Ideology wants people’s bodies to be the same as the bodies of fish.

Todd Labrador and the German boat builder

Recently I read about:

He’s a M’ikmaq who builds birch bark canoes, and during this summer he apprenticed Mi’kmaq youth. Where he taught them was at the Millbrook Cultural and Heritage Centre in Millbrook, Nova Scotia. The apprentice program was called the Mi’kmaw Birch Bark Canoe Builder Live Exhibit and Youth Apprentice Program. It started on June 5th and had run for 6 weeks.

What’s interesting is that Todd Labrador had never built a canoe with his own hands until he learned from a German Nova Scotian.

Todd Labrador had learned from his dad, Charlie Labrador, what materials to harvest and use, but his dad had never assembled those materials into a canoe. Todd’s grandfather, Joe Jeremy, had taught Todd’s dad to gather and prepare the materials, but not how to craft those materials into a canoe.

So, during his 20s, Todd Labrador learned to build a birch bark canoe with his own hands from a German Nova Scotian.

The name of that German boat builder was never mentioned by the Globe and Mail nor by the CBC. Either only emphasized that he had learned from other Mi’kmaqs.

In an interview with Beverley Ware of the Halifax Herald on Tuesday April 7th 2009, which was called “Transforming bark to boat“, Todd mentioned the German boat builder:

Todd Labrador’s desire to do that took him to Halifax in his early 20s where he got his first lessons from, of all people, a German man living there. ‘He was fascinated by the First Nations culture,’ Mr. Labrador said, and he set him on his path. ‘I made a lot of mistakes,’ Mr. Labrador grins, but he was an enthusiastic student.

This interview isn’t stored in the online archives of the Halifax Herald. The website archives only go back to 2012.

Instead Dr. Daniel Paul, a Mi’kmaq, had made a copy of the interview on his website.

The full article is also here:

Transforming bark to boat

By BEVERLEY WARE South Shore Bureau

Tue. Apr 7 – 7:21 AM

HEBBS CROSS — With toughened hands, Todd Labrador threads a stripped, wet piece of root from a spruce tree through a hole in the top edge of the birch bark and pulls it out the other side.

It takes effort to yank the entire length of tree root through the hole, and then he lifts it back over the lip of the canoe and threads it back through the birch bark again from the outside.

“It’s hard work, it is,” Mr. Labrador said. His daughter Melissa usually does most of the sewing. She develops calluses as she threads over 15 metres of root over the course of a couple of days. Mr. Labrador is Mi’kmaq and learned the ancient art of making birch bark canoes from his father, Charlie Labrador, who learned from his grandfather, Joe Jeremy.

His grandfather died in 1961, a year after Todd Labrador was born, “but I always heard stories about him from my father,” he said. “I became fascinated by it quite young.”

His dad showed him how to collect birch bark, dig up tree roots and bend wood, but Charlie Labrador had never made a canoe.

Todd Labrador’s desire to do that took him to Halifax in his early 20s where he got his first lessons from, of all people, a German man living there. “He was fascinated by the First Nations culture,” Mr. Labrador said, and he set him on his path.

“I made a lot of mistakes,” Mr. Labrador grins, but he was an enthusiastic student.

He began by making models that ranged from one to two metres and as he did so, he continued to learn from books, his father and by asking elders for their advice.

Today, he has three canoes in a large workshop behind his white and red pine log home, which sits on the edge of Minamkeak Lake in Hebbs Cross, just west of Bridgewater.

Inside the shop, the gentle smells of pine, spruce and ash warm the senses. As he works, Mr. Labrador can watch the wind toss the grey lake water. The ice is gone now, and he’s looking forward to taking one of these canoes down to the water’s edge.

Students from native and non-native schools come here to see the two canoes he made for his family, watch him work on the five-metre canoe that will be ready for launch this June, and learn about the Acadia First Nation.

On the wall over the expansive window hangs a worn birch bark canoe, its old green paint scuffed away in parts. It was made about 100 years ago and given to him by a friend who knows of his passion. “For me, it is a wealth of information. I study it. I look at it.”

It takes him back in time; imbues him with patience and respect.

“If you work with things, they teach you, if you allow them to, and if you go about it in a respectful way. If you’re trying to force a piece of birch bark or a piece of wood, it will break on you. If you think about it, work with the material and respect the material, it is amazing what you can do with it.”

The two finished canoes are works of beauty. Their bark is bleached by the summer sun; they are concrete images of a culture that honours nature.

His craft extends to etching petroglyphic-like pictures onto slate and making drums from deer and moose hides that are stretched over spruce frames, and then painted with designs important to native culture.

He has made seven full-sized canoes that are in such places as the Bear River Cultural Centre in Queens County, Glooscap Heritage Centre in Millbrook and a little museum in Les Ormes, south of Paris, France.

“I’d like to have a bunch of canoes that I can take out, show to people, get people in them and using them and learning about native culture. It’s important to me that they know and that I involve as many people as I can, especially the youth.”

He hopes to take them to the International Canoe Federation’s world championships at Lake Banook this August. But his immediate goal is to make an ocean-going birch bark canoe. It will be bigger — about 6.5 metres — and have a raised hump in the middle.

“It’s something in me I have to do.”

I would like to find out the boat builder’s name because of this:

A German who was living in Halifax, Nova Scotia, had known how to build a birch bark canoe because he was “fascinated with First Nations culture” and he had taken the time to teach Todd Labrador. A German Nova Scotian had valued First Nations culture, and his name should be mentioned in today’s narrative of reconciliation between all Canadians and the First Nations.

Bill C-16

Bill C-16 was made law on June 19th, 2017, by Canada’s Senate.

Politically-Correct

What is Bill C-16?

Bill C-16 extends protection against hate propaganda toward gender identity and gender expression.

Bill C-16 adds gender identity and gender expression to the list of prohibited grounds of discrimination.

Bill C-16 is an act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code.

Politically-INCorrect

I had never heard of Transgender activists and their lobbying until Bill C-16 was made law.

Now, a year later, I know about the problems caused by Transgender activists. These problems are the tactics of public shaming, political censorship and actual violence.

The men who gender as women do sketchy and questionable political tactics to natal women.

Transsexuals, like Miranda Yardley, are for example rejected from their political office whenever they publicly dissent today’s Trans ideology and its rhetoric.

The UK Labour Party for instance believes that Trans Women are Women whenever a man says the words “I’m a woman” and self IDs as a woman. The UK Labour Party furthermore believes that Trans Women are the most murdered, suicidal and marginalized women in the world. The Labour party also pays no attention to the shaming, censorship and violence that the Trans Women do to the British Feminists, Lesbians and Transsexuals.

The point is that today’s Transactivism is foul. It has rotten bits.

The rhetoric that Trans Women are the most oppressed women in the world is a rotten narrative. It’s a lie. Or it’s a lie because the men who gender as women do the tactics of public shaming, censorship and violence. The most marginalized women in the world aren’t in the position of political power to do these tactics to win their goals. In other words, the Trans Women are politically powerful.

However, believe what you want until you get publicly shamed, silenced and bullied.

Tracey Ullman: “When you’re so woke, you’re asleep”

This gives me hope 😂🤣😅.

The BBC still has a sense of humour.

This sketch wasn’t CENSORED by the Millennials who are trying to be deeply virtuous. That virtue would be the virtue of Social Justice.

One minute you’re carrying a reusable water bottle, and the next minute you’re arguing water is racist.”

Progressivism never ever stops.

This is a funny comic.

It depicts the slippery slope of Progress. Specifically it’s a pock shot at Progressive morals and why “Progressivism” never stops erasing and replacing tradition. That tradition would be traditional knowledge, culture and morals upheld by indigenous Elders. That’s one example.

My specific problem I have with White progressive liberals is that they only get miffed when a younger generation of “Progressives” mature into young adulthood and demand to replace the Elders. Liberal progressives prefer to never quit replacing whatever morals and cultural riches had predated them with their own thought up morals. Simply put, Progressivism is a belief that an older moral system must be erased and replaced with a more chic and edgier moral system.

The Indigenous peoples in Canada get what I’m talking about because they were legislated by White liberal progressive-minded Canadians to attend *Residential Schools*.

Progressive liberals expounded they were on the “right side of history” and felt moral goodness when the Canadian federal government had made it law to pack up and send off Indigenous children to both Catholic and Protestant run boarding schools. All these schools where managed by a majority of White people. There was a token Indian administrator, but the majority were White Canadians. An example of a such an Indian administrator was the Indigenous man who was the principal of the Protestant Christian run residential school, called Cecilia Jeffrey Indian Residential School, which Chanie Wenjack had ran away from. Chanie Wenjack had also died of exposure.

I also am honestly very tired of repeatedly being interrupted with “…but SLAVERY and the Jim Crow legislated White Supremacy in the U.S. had to be erased by Progressives.” However, I’m not talking about that, Buttheads. I’m talking about a wholesale and never-ending erasure of traditions and moral systems like:

1) You are a child from a First Nations band in Canada, and you were legislated to get only schooled in English because your ancestors “Native” language was believed to be “dated”.

I’m talking about neverending Progressivism that does erasure like that. Got it?

That is my warning to anyone who wants to talk about White Supremacy and about how White progressive liberals were always saving the day. White progressives have fucked up, and they continue to leave their foot prints on someone else’s tradition of respecting their Elders.

Transgender Politics and its dismissive racism to Female Genital Mutilation – part 2

The British Columbia NDP have chosen to ignore me and other women. They chose to be complicit and to endorse the *racism* that Morgane Oger said to a Black woman when she explained Female Genital Mutilation to him and the exact reason why it’s done.

Maybe you can let the BC NDP know that you’re aware of Morgane Oger and his dismissive racist speech to a Black woman. Or maybe not.

(Morgane Oger is the Vice President of the British Columbia NDP, and certainly has power and is not marginalized.)

A Black woman, named Jana Cornell, tried to educate him about the reality of Female Genital Mutilation, but Morgane chose to regurgitate apologetics for his Transgender Ideology to that woman.

Morgane talked over her, gaslighted her and tried to curry sympathy from observers that he was being victimized by her. Morgane specifically accused her of “leveraging Transphobia” while she was talking about the reality of Female Genital Mutilation.

FGM is never called “Gendered Violence”. The word “Gender” is a moniker that Western, White Male-to-female Transgender Activists overuse, and natal women who were subjected to Female Genital Mutilation only call FGM as “Sex-based Violence”.

Morgane Oger refused to think outside his Transgender beliefs for just one minute to know the vocabulary that women who endured Female Genital Mutilation speak and write must be respected.

Morgane chose to be a hypocrite and a self-righteous minded White Transgender activist.

Morgane chose to not take a break from his Transgender worldview to see, for one minute, that he is a hypocrite who polices people’s speech (because pronouns are the latest human right), and that he failed to police his own *racism* toward a Black woman’s correct vocabulary for Female Genital Mutilation.

Pronouns, pronouns and importantly pronouns matter to Morgane Oger above all else. Pronouns must be respected, but Morgane should be excused for being dismissively racist to the words that a Black woman told him to use when he talked with her about Female Genital Mutilation.

Morgane said “Gendered Violence” and she said “No, you have to know that Female Genital Mutilation is Sex-based Violence.”

Morgane ignored her authority and had assumed the expert on the vocabulary of FGM was him.

In all, I don’t care about Morgane’s pronouns because he has not cared, for one minute, about the vocabulary that a Black woman told him to use when talking with a survivor of Female Genital Mutilation.

Transgender Activism ignores the grooming gangs in the United Kingdom

I have kept in touch with Miranda Yardley. Miranda is a rare transsexual dissenter of the Millennials and the few Gen Xers who campaign the current Transgender Ideology and its politics.

I haved watched Miranda get called “IT” and also dickless and nutless by men who identify themselves as women. None of the monster TERFs have degraded Miranda with this loathsome name calling. I mean, the Millennial white guys who gender themselves as women aren’t fooling whenever they mock Miranda by different versions of the word “eunuch”. Miranda was also called an “Organ Grinder“.

This brings me to my point:

The Millennial men who gender themselves as women do very dirty politics. Such tactics would be this: They claim violence is being done to them WHENEVER they are actively cyber and IRL stalking Miranda Yardley. They go after her, but they say that she is doing violence to them.

Miranda is daily trolled by Millennial TRAs who desperately want to bait and trap her with the condemnation of Racist, Sexist, Homophobe, Bigot and as a “Phobe” to human babies, kittens and puppies. They really want to call her EVIL.

And so I watched another dismal attempt.

What happened was that Ruth Raddish (not the author) had joined Miranda’s group on MeWe. Ruth was there with complete bad faith and intentions to condemn Miranda as a RACIST.

Ruth wanted Miranda to say “Yes, I speak for @ThePosieParker and I am responsible for whatever she tweets even though I’m permanently banned from Twitter.”

Ruth Raddish wanted Miranda to compromise herself by answering this question:

What’s your opinion on the racism that’s openly emerged in your movement!

@ThePosieParker had tweeted:

No idea. But there are pockets of Bradford where the culture is not British. Like many ex pat communities they hold on to their past culture rather tightly. There was an all boys school that was 99.9% Pakistani Muslim. Awful place for women.”

Ruth Raddish didn’t neutrally ask her question about that tweet. Ruth was accusatory with an exclamation mark. Neutral questions are asked in good faith with a question mark.

Miranda saw the ruse for what it was. So she repeatedly answered that she couldn’t give an opinion about what Posie Parker meant or didn’t mean as racism because Miranda wasn’t Posie Parker. Instead Posie Parker should be directly asked that adversarial question.

Miranda also answered with a question about the racism that’s being done by Transgender Activists. The activists have yet to acknowledge that they do racism. It’s an epidemic they insist to remain blind and mute towards because they must be on the “right side of history“, and being on that side means they are never wrong.

I also answered back: “Ruth, how about you pay attention to the White Transgender activists who are dismissively racist to Black women when they talk about their Female Genital Mutilation and about the reality of why FGM is done?

Ruth Raddish grudgingly answered “…fine, that’s racist.”

I don’t have the screenshot because when Miranda had evicted Ruth from the MeWe group, Ruth’s question and the convo were also deleted. It was deleted when I had halfway screencaptured the convo.

But I can rehash what was said.

What Ruth did next was call Miranda “IT“, and Miranda replied ‘Fuck You‘.

Miranda finally commented to be civil or leave.

I finally said: “…Ruth, just maybe, and could it be possible that Posie Parker’s tweet was referring to the systemic grooming gangs that are 100% operated by British Pakistanis Muslim Men?

and

“…could it be possible that the all boys school, which Posie had guestimated as 99% attended by British Pakistanis Muslim boys, is an *awful place for women* because she was referring to the reality of the grooming gangs?”.

I also added ‘British Somali Men‘ because Somali Brits are starting to set up grooming gangs.

But, of course, that was the answer Ruth Rubbish had wanted Miranda to say, and it was the answer that Ruth cried: “I knew it! You’re RACIST! And I have screencapped everything to show on my social media that you’re racist. Gotcha!

And, yet, Ruth was meant to share what I said about the Rochdale, Telford and so many other grooming gangs.

Today’s Transgender Activists love to maintain a very major blindspot toward the racism that’s done by British Pakistanis Muslim Men to only White British Girls who are poor, non-believers, and are from troubled homes.

The Leftists refuse to speak about what the Brit Pakistanis are doing as systemic racism to only White, poor, non-Muslim British girls whose families are dysfunctional.

No Black Brits and no South Asian Brits are being targeted, recruited, sexually exploited and prostituted by the 100% run British Pakistanis grooming gangs. But Ruth Rubbish had ‘Gotcha-ed‘ me: I also mentioned that the British Somali Men were beginning to set up their own grooming gangs.