WordPress censors GenderTrender: Why?

GenderTrender has been dumped, which is censored, by WordPress.com. The fact of why is that GenderTrender had published a previous legal name of a Transgender Woman. That name was a male name, and is found in the public domain.

4thWaveNow has also explained succinctly what WordPress had done to GenderTrender, which you can read here.

It’s now clear that WordPress supports the blanket enforcement against deadnaming. Let there be no doubts: WordPress firmly views the publishing of former names as “malicious publication” when the owner of those names currently lives a “transgender identity.

The problem of doing an uncritical blanket ban against reporting a previous legal name of the Transgender person is that abusers will exploit this blanket ban to hide their history of abuse from online publishing. Independent reporters, bloggers, and news websites would effectively be gagged from publishing the previous alias which an abuser lived by.

A gag order would censor the history of let’s say a Transgender Woman who had trolled underage girls to groom them for sexual exploitation. He did this while living by his natal male name. As well, years or months later this same man had decided to gender as a woman, and he then adopted a woman’s name as his new legal name.

A gag order would effectively censor the connection of the Transgender Woman’s abuse to the time in her life while she was living as a natal male.

Abusers thrive when they are able to disconnect their past alias from their current legal name. They hide their history by that disconnect.

You could also end up viewing this disconnect as there’s still a man who’s completely unrelated to the Transgender Woman: Effectively two different people. However, that’s a ridiculous logical conclusion. But then again, I wouldn’t be surprised if abusive males could hide their history by the guise of two different people: One being a natal male and the other a Transgender Woman.

Trans Rights are Human Rights

On October 18th, Emma Watson posted this on her Twitter:

She also uploaded this photo to her Instagram and Facebook.

Now then, I have only two contentions with her celebrity endorsement.

First, the problem of self-ID isn’t being admitted by the Trans Rights Activists. The TRAs are in complete denial of self-ID being abused.

I sincerely would have a bit of respect for the TRAs IF they would admit that predatory men have been identifying themselves as women while they’re incarcerated in a men’s prison. Self-ID has permitted these men to make a simple declaration that they’re women, and the prison warden then had to transfer them to a women’s prison.

I’m also not talking about only one man, nor two or three men. More than a few predatory men have been exploiting self-ID. They would be:

Carrie Cooper (Gary Cooper), Jacinta Brooks (Duncan Smart), Jessica Winfield (Martin Ponting), Michelle Lewin (Shaun Pudwell), and the list goes on for men who are incarcerated in the UK prisons. And think about that: This is only a brief list for men in the UK prisons.

There are many men like Karen White who have put on a wig, make-up and women’s clothing as their facade to coerce the prison administration to transfer them to a women’s prison. These men have said the words “I’m A Woman” to manipulate the prison staff to transfer them to a women’s prison.

It’s also not just women’s prisons that are being infiltrated by exploitative males. Women’s shelters are being colonized by grown men who have stated they’re women.

So then that’s my first cautionary contention: I know self-ID omits safeguarding. It’s naively open to abusive men to exploit.

My second contention with Emma Watson’s backing is that it’s…

…and celebrities have been wrong about what they’ve endorsed.

Here’s an example: Kathy Lee Gifford endorsed the wrong idea that vaccines cause autism.

She has consistently stated her belief in fraud research that presents vaccines as a cause for autism.

Here’s an example of fraud research: Dr. Andrew Wakefield scared parents from vaccinating their kids with the Measles/Mumps/Rubella vaccine.

He published an indictment of the MMR vaccine in The Lancet in 1998, and for 12 years this fraud had informed parents.

For 12 years the parents of autistic children had cited this article as unquestionable evidence that the MMR vaccine caused autism.

In 2010, The Lancet finally retracted Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s fraud research. And yet, more than a few parents continue to believe they shouldn’t vaccinate their kids with the MMR vaccine.

So once again Measles is infecting kids in countries like Canada, the US, and similar, because more than a few people don’t use them. The herd immunity is not possible when people opt out. As well some people can’t get vaccinated because their immunity is compromised from medications like chemotherapy drugs. Such people have to rely on the possibility that other people are vaccinated.

In all, those are my two contentions with Emma Watson’s celebrity endorsement of “Trans Rights are Human Rights“. I would like to one day see the Trans Rights Activists owe up to the fact that predatory men are currently exploiting self-ID to their advantage. And, finally, I don’t follow celebrity endorsements because, well, celebrities have been wrong.

Scottish Bill confirms “Transwomen ARE Women”

This is an insightful examination of Scotland’s “Gender Representation on Public Boards Bill“. The Scottish bill was legislated prior to the UK’s public consultation about reforming its Gender Recognition Act.

Also this consequence of the Scottish bill will occur:

The Bill allows for the [Public Board] position to be given to someone who is not a woman, where it can be justified on the basis of a ‘characteristic’ or ‘situation’ particular to another candidate. For example, this might mean that where a man and a woman are equally qualified, the man may be given the position if he has another under-represented protected characteristic. There had been some uncertainty expressed during stage 1 about the meaning of ‘characteristic’. This amendment clarifies that the reference to a ‘characteristic’ includes a ‘protected characteristic’ as defined in the Equality Act 2010.”

Scottish Women

The Scottish Govts newly passed gender bill, the Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scot) Bill, has redefined the language used in the GRA. A person is no longer reassigned a gender. This legislation now defines it as ‘becoming female’.

The GRA doesn’t actually believe that a man can become female. It’s purpose was to give a transsexual person legal recognition

The Equality Act 2010 clearly uses the word ‘reassign’. To reallocate, to rename, to reappoint, to give, to transfer.

Nothing to do with ‘becoming’. To evolve into, to metamorphose, to turn into, to transform, change into

A male cannot ever become a female.

Words matter.

The language has changed from

…. undergoing a process for the purpose of ‘reassigning the persons sex by changing physiological or other attributes of sex’ ….. to

to quite simply

….. undergoing a process for the purpose of ‘becoming female’ ……..

To process of gender…

View original post 532 more words

You are a woman because you say the words, “I’m a woman”.

I’ve been closely watching UK politics specifically for the intimidation and posturing that the British Trans Rights Activists have been doing. The Brit TRAs are no different than the Transactivists & their allies in the US, Canada, and elsewhere in Anglophone western countries. As well, Francophone TRAs behave the same as their English speaking peers.

 

What’s publicly unfolded in the UK is special. This country is the only jurisdiction where the government has done a “public consultation” and not a “parliament-only” consultation to reform a current law. That public consultation has asked for every Brit’s opinion about what the impact would be IF the Tory government had changed the current law of the Gender Recognition Act regarding who could identify as a woman and as a man, or as non-binary.

 

The change to the GRA would impact in this way:

 

1) The process of how a Brit could claim to be the gender of a woman or a man.

 

And it would impact in this way:

 

2) Establish self-ID and whittle down the current gatekeeping and safeguarding to permit a self-declaration of being a woman or a man as the only necessary administrative process. This would mean, speak the words, “I’m A Woman” and that statement would make you a legally recognized woman.

 

So then, I’ve been watching the fallout in the UK.

 

Absolute gender self-ID — which is only a self-reported declaration — has already harmed girls, boys and women in the United Kingdom.

 

Self-ID done with impunity has meant this:

 

Predatory men exploiting self-ID.

 

Such men have been:

The Trans Rights Activists have yet to, and probably never will, denounce each male pedophile and rapist who have used self-ID. Such men have abused self-ID to transfer themselves into a women’s prison. They have also continued to do their sexual crimes while dressed as women.

 

Finally:

 

I’ve uploaded to my website the BBC Newsnight episode, “Changing Gender: Should the law change?”.

 

In sum, the fallout in the UK has meant this:

 

When women have tried to gather in public spaces, Trans Rights Activists have undoubtedly done intimidation tactics. These tactics are also famously done by organized crime and gangs. As well, tribal societies do the tactics of posturing and intimidation, and they do it as tribal war.

 

So then, here’s what the British TRAs have consistently done to women who have spoken against their political mantra for gender self-ID. That mantra is for all men to say they’re women, which includes male pedophiles and rapists:

 

1. Trans Rights Activists have mobbed & assaulted women (Example: Maria MacLachlan).

 

2. They have slurred women (Example: Transgender apologists, Owen Jones & Adrian Harrop).

 

3. They have unjustly — because it’s against democracy — banned women from holding their meetings in civic buildings (Example: Leeds Civic Hall).

 

4. They have no-platformed women (Example: Germaine Greer, Julie Bindel).

 

5. They have banned women from Twitter (Example: Venice Allan & transsexual Miranda Yardley)

 

6. And they have intimidated women to hide & their cancel meetings.

 

This demonstrates that the TRAs consistently behave as gangs. They do unrelenting aggression toward women, and specifically have done that to Woman’s Place.

Men like Karen White, of course, exploit Gender self-ID

Stephen Wood enjoys pretending he’s a woman called Karen White. Gender self-ID is a facade to Stephen Wood. Self-ID was the easiest method for him to exploit. It earned him an easy transfer into the women’s prison HMP New Hall, in Flockton, the UK.

The prosecution was absolutely right about Karen White.

Christopher Dunn, the prosecutor, told the Leeds Crown Court:

She is allegedly a transgender female. The prosecution say allegedly because there’s smatterings of evidence in this case that the defendant’s approach to transitioning has been less than committed.”

“The prosecution suggest the reason for the lack of commitment towards transitioning is so the defendant can use a transgender persona to put herself in contact with vulnerable persons she can then abuse.

Gender self-ID is wonderfully open to abuse by:

It’s completely open to exploitation by a…

and a…

It’s a sad story that Stephen Wood could have been kept out of the women’s prison with safeguarding. However, safeguarding is completely non-existent when self-ID is the rule.

So then, Stephen Wood had sexually assaulted the women inmates within days of arriving at HMP New Hall in Flockton, near Wakefield, during the autumn of 2017. As Karen White, he watched and ogled the natal women in the communal showers:

However, Karen White could be transferred back into a women’s prison.

Richard Garside, the Director of @crimeandjustice, has an explanation as to why Stephen Wood as Karen White could be housed again in a women’s prison:

Could Karen White be transferred back to a women’s prison? The short answer is yes. Here’s how…”

Gender self-ID: A path of least resistance for men like Karen White

Trans Women are Women, and these Women will never abuse self-ID.

 

So goes the motto, and also this…

 

Predatory men will never abuse self-ID.

 

These are statements of creed by Trans Rights Activists. The TRAs will simply not admit, for one minute, that there are predatory males who will exploit self-ID. Such men are:

Otherwise known as:

There will always be a Stephen Wood who will self-identify as a woman to continue to do his sexual crimes with this self-ID as his cover and ruse.

Self-ID is fundamentally open to exploitation by male pedophiles, rapists and by any man who does male pattern sexual crime.

Self-ID has no requisite gatekeeping and safeguarding as part of its philosophy. So then, say the words “I’m A Woman” and wear the facade of a wig, blouse and prosthetic breasts, and you could go into any space that’s only for women. You could self-ID while you’re incarcerated in a men’s prison and enjoy a transfer into a women’s prison where the most vulnerable women are housed. Self-ID is a means to an end for all the predatory males who will do any tactic to do their sexual crimes.

Never underestimate men like:

The Karen Whites are calculating and emotionally manipulative males. They will game and chance any philosophy and system to do their sexual crimes. Example: Karen White had repeatedly abused his neighbours in social housing in the village of Mytholmroyd, West Yorkshire before he was sent to a men’s prison and then to a women’s prison. He abused their belief in human rights by threatening to report them to the police for a hate crime. He threatened every time they never called him a “her” and each time they critically questioned the veracity of his self-ID.

Here’s what the neighbours said:

We did not have a problem with her being transgender. We already had another transgender woman living here and we all got on just fine. [But Karen White] was always calling the police accusing us of hate crimes against her. And then she started getting violent – it was a terrifying time for all of us – we wish she had never been placed here.”

As well, there are too many “woke” useful idiots like Adrian Harrop and Owen Jones who drivel it’s bigotry and phobia to say that predatory males will exploit self-ID. They stupidly drivel that this demonizes transgender people and it implies they’re sexual predators. The useful idiots repeat the mantra that it conflates transgender women with sexual predators whenever we speak that male pedophiles and rapists will exploit self-ID. They chant that it adds to the stigma some transgender women experience.

However the Self-ID Apologists will eventually perceive that patience for their rhetoric has run out.

To the Gender Apologists, I say this: “Yes, please, continue to remain mute and complicit about self-ID being exploitable.”

Eventually the pawns for the bullish and militant Transactivists will succumb to ridicule because they chose to never admit that there are men like Karen White.

We raided and sold our neighbours as slaves.

Recently, in June 2018, the Oluwo of Iwo made a public apology.

Who’s the Oluwo of Iwo?

He’s the king of the Iwo Kingdom in Nigeria. Iwo is a city in the Osun State in Nigeria, and the Iwo Kingdom is based on this city. The Iwo Kingdom is also a traditional state.

Now what’s interesting about this apology is that it’s specifically about his monarchy. It’s an apology, which admits that his ancestors had condoned and earned wealth from the African slavers who had raided and sold their peers from rival tribes to the Europeans.

It’s very telling to read this honest admittance from a monarch in Nigeria:

“I regret the involvement of traditional institutions in slavery. Monarchs are one of the stakeholders that promoted slavery. We sold our children for a wall clock, tobacco, alcohol, guns, glass cup, wine, necklace, food plate, sweet and other unmerited peanuts such that, today, many Africans are permanently loss to suffer the stigmatization and unfair treatment till date.

I take the bull by the horns to apologize for the role kingship played in slave trade because of material life. Many black Americans are yet to recover from the wound of slavery. I`m apologizing to the accidental blacks in Cuba, Brazil, Caribbeans, America and other parts of the world. I want the victims to acknowledge our regret for the past and we move forward.

White men never forced us to sell our children as slave. Our fathers voluntarily released their children on excitement for peanut. Then, there was no means of payment. Human were offered in exchange for glittering material gifts. Such ignorance shouldn’t have survived without monarchs consent, who by then were the heads. We owe past and current an apology. I’m leading in tendering that.”

The Transatlantic Slave Trade was only possible because it took willing sellers and willing buyers to make this trade happen. So then, there were Africans who raided and sold their peers from rival tribes to the Europeans. Unfortunately, they were willing sellers.

It seems to me that it’s both greed and complicity that these African slavers felt. The Europeans were also cravenly interested in purchasing slaves as guaranteed labour to build and harvest the cash crops for their colonies.